 |


|
 |

Kim M. Schmid
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Kim M. Schmid focuses her practice defending companies in drug and medical device litigation in courts across the country. In addition to her defense litigation practice,
she advises her clients on FDA regulatory compliance and reporting requirements.
In courts, Kim has successfully tried cases and defended medical device products including latex gloves, breast implants, hip stem implants, pain pumps, orthopedic devices, implantable cardiac care devices, suction devices, surgical instruments, device monitors and blood warming units, to name a few. She has defended IDE products being evaluated in clinical trials as well as Class I, II and III FDA approved devices. Kim has defended pharmaceutical cases involving generics, branded, OTC and Rx medications. Kim has served as national coordinating counsel and regional counsel in various pharmaceutical and medical device litigation matters. She has written articles and presented at national seminars on issues relating to drug and device litigation.
Kim has defended individual lawsuits, cases involved in mass tort and multi-district litigation (MDL).
Kim is an active member of the DRI's Drug and Medical Device Subcommittee and LifeScience Alley.
- Drug and Medical Device Litigation
- Automotive
- Minnesota, 1988
- Wisconsin, 1997
- U.S. District Court District of Minnesota, 1988
- U.S. District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin, 2004
- U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin, 2004
- U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit, 2006
- William Mitchell College of Law, St Paul, Minnesota,
1988
J.D. Honors: Cum Laude
Law Review:
Associate Editor, William Mitchell Law Review, 1987 - 1988
- St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota,
1982
B.A. Honors: Cum Laude
- College of Saint Benedict, Saint Joseph, Minnesota
- "Riegel v. Medtronic: Better Off Without It?" (co-authored with Shane Bohnen), Product Liability Law 360, August 1, 2008
- Fast Food in the Gunsights - - Class Actions as Political Weapons, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2002
- Minnesota Rejects Alternative Design Test in Products Liability Law 14 William Mitchell Law Review 198, 1987
- Dual Capacity Exception Unlikely in Minnesota 14 William Mitchell Law Review 204, 1987
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Breg, Inc.
- Medmarc Insurance Company
- Cynacon/Ocusoft
- C.B. Fleet Company, Inc.
- Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
- Thoratec Corporation
- Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America
- Nissan Motor Co.
- 21st Annual Medical Device Seminar - "Reigel v. Metronic Decision and Preemption", Sanders Conkright & Warren LLP and Medmarc,
June 11, 2008
-
June 13, 2008
- MNASQ Biomedical Focus Group - "Hot Topics in Medical Device Litigation", February,
2007
- Defense Research Institute, Inc.
- Drug and Medical Device Subcommittee
- LifeScience Alley
- Minnesota State Bar Association
- State Bar of Wisconsin
- 1959, St. Cloud, Minnesota
|
 |
|